Skip to main content

Hierarchy of D-classes determined by rank

The D-classes have a certain type of hierarchy. And to illustrate this, I'll give relevant properties of the rank of a transformation.


The first property is that the rank of a product of two transformations is less than or equal to the minimum of the individual ranks.

Let's flesh this out some more. Let's start with what I call the nobility in this hierarchy--the permutations. The noble class would like their wealth and power to stay within their class or family. How do they do that?

The idea is to marry someone with the same social class as you are. It's a very common trope in movies and TV.

So in the same way, for an "offspring" of a permutation to have the full rank still, both of its "parents" should be permutations.

rank(ab)=n  if and only if rank(a)=rank(b)=n

As part of group theory, we study permutations. This is because a group is embedded in a permutation group by Cayley's theorem. In the finite case, every group of order n is isomorphic to some subgroup of the permutation group Sn.

In permutation groups, we've explored the interaction between a permutation and another permutation. 

But this time, we will study the interaction of permutations and transformations. Using the social class as a metaphor, we will study the interaction of the nobility and the commoners.

Let's look at two elements from the same D-class. That means then that they have the same rank because a D-class is determined by a rank k. Now if we get the product of two transformation of the same rank, say k, are we assured that the rank of their product is equal to k?

And the answer is no. It may happen, it may not happen.

Having the product of two transformations retain the rank of its "parents" is boring. Let's consider the other case where the rank of the "offspring" is less than the rank of the "parents".
 
 
 
Let k be greater than 1. If b is not a permutation, then there exists an element a in Dk such that rank(ab) is less than or equal to k-1 (downward social mobility of the offspring). In particular, there exists an element a which has the same rank as b but rank(ab) is less than k. That is, their "offspring" has lower rank than them.

Therefore, the rank of a product of two transformations of the same rank is not necessarily preserved.
 
This property is the reason why a transformation which is not a permutation not a part of the separator of the D-class.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Greatest Love Story Ever Told

This is the greatest love story ever told (and still being written). And I’m living in it! Since this blog has been instrumental in making it happen, it’s only fitting that I post it here. And so when people (me included) think it happened so fast, it’s actually years in the making. Having this blog fast tracked the “getting to know” stage. At least, that’s the logical part of me talking. But love is rarely logical.  How it started A day after final exams for the summer term of AY 2023-2024, I received a bunch of anonymous emails. At first, I shrugged it off as a newsletter that I signed up to. A couple emails later, it became clear that it came from one of my former students. Didn’t know it was her until August 2nd. Realized feelings were mutual the day after. Made the relationship official on August 7th. I was the one who asked because “she didn’t wanna cross the line”.  I used to say, in this blog , that I’m only interested in how couples get together, not really what’s ...

Happy new year!

I'm done with the dissertation. I sent it to my adviser and I'm just waiting for his feedback. This past month has been tough. I realized that I couldn't make it to the deadline. I could not graduate this semester. My break was not fun. It was no break at all. But it's over now. And strangely, I don't know what to do with myself. What do I do with my free time? Guess I gotta find a job soon.

A letter to my future self

A letter to myself (written Nov 2021) *** You probably heard by now. The result of the comprehensive exams. And I'm going to influence that (whatever it is). You're probably angry with me because I slacked off. I continue to procrastinate because I haven't been punished yet. I hope I don't get punished. You're going to take the brunt of that. It's weird talking to you (myself) like this. I know I'm already behind. I don't know where to start. Where to prioritize. I can't afford to go slow. But I also can't panic. I hope I don't panic tomorrow. I know I've been selfish. Talking about myself like this. What about you? I hope you get the favorable outcome that you wanted. I haven't been helpful on that front. But I will still try. No matter how small time there is left. If I'm able to pull this off, I hope you give your best in your research! Show them what you're made of! That's the only consolation for the anguish that this...